re: once again."Stalinesque tactics of the neo cons" (Greenwich Village)
Reply to: comm-676172924@craigslist.org
Date: 2008-05-11, 3:50AM EDT
Well then my comrade in Joisey. Many thanks for the corrections in grammar and spelling.
For one there is not contest here, ( between you and I, that is). Despite your angry rhetoric and oft angst ridden posts about homosexuality, and the fear of Democratic rule being equivalent to communism, I respectfully disagree.
But I thank you for making a point on my behalf. According to you, all the candidates inclusive of McCain are liberals, from plain ole liberal in McCain and socialist and communist in the form of Obama or Clinton. That being said, I guess you lose. You were unable to get support for a candidate that would fit the Limbaustic ( law breaking ) and fellow neo con definition for conservative.
So where's your support?
The answer is there isn't any or you'd have your neo-con candidate.
I won't engage you in the absurd tactic "science" from your way of defining it.
One thing is clear, to which you do admit. You don't have a neo con, in the form you'd like to have seen running.
And the reason is because they've been a colossal failure and have been rejected by the Republican base.
Oh my what will you do when you're once again under commie rule? lol.
Sorry for your experiences. But your analysis of where Democrats stand and the comparison with Soviet Communism are simply wrong. It's good PR chatter, but without merit.
Happy Mother's Day !
- it's NOT ok to contact this poster with services or other commercial interests
PostingID: 676172924